Human capabilities are being enhanced by digital life, but eons-old human pursuits are being disrupted. In ambient information and connection, code-driven systems have reached more than half of the world’s population, presenting previously unimagined opportunities and hazards. Will people be better off than they are today as developing algorithm-driven artificial intelligence (AI) continues to spread?
In the summer of 2018, a survey of 979 technology pioneers, inventors, developers, corporate and policy leaders, researchers, and activists elicited responses to this topic.
According to the experts, networked artificial intelligence Malaysia would increase human effectiveness but will also jeopardise human autonomy, agency, and capabilities. They discussed the vast potential; that computers could eventually match or even surpass human intelligence and capacities in complex decision-making, reasoning, and learning, advanced analytics and pattern recognition, visual acuity, speech recognition, and language translation. They asserted that “smart” systems in communities, automobiles, buildings and utilities, farms, and business operations will save time, money, and lives. It will also providing individuals with opportunity to enjoy a more tailored future.
Human Concern Towards AI, artificial intelligence malaysia
Many of the upbeat statements centred on health care and the numerous applications of AI in diagnosing and treating illnesses, as well as assisting senior persons in living more active and healthy lives. They were also enthused about AI’s potential to contribute to large-scale public-health programmes based on vast volumes of data about anything from personal genomes to diet that may be recorded in the coming years. Additionally, several of these experts projected that AI would aid in the long-awaited transformation of formal and informal education systems.
Nonetheless, the majority of experts, whether hopeful or pessimistic, expressed concern about the long-term influence of these new tools on the fundamental aspects of being human. All responders to this non-scientific survey were ask to explain why they believed AI would benefit people or not. Many expressed grave concerns, and many also provided possible answers. The preceding table summarises the major themes they raised on dangers and remedies.
Participants were specifically asked to consider the following:
Artificial Intelligence Network
“Please consider the year 2030. Analysts anticipate that people’s reliance on networked artificial intelligence (AI) in complicated digital systems will get even stronger. According to others, when we widely use these networked tools, we will continue on the historic arc of augmenting our lives with largely favourable outcomes. According to others, our growing reliance on these AI and associated systems will almost certainly result in widespread troubles.
By 2030, do you believe it is more likely that advances in AI and related technology systems will augment and empower human capabilities? That is, would the majority of people be better off than they are today most of the time? Or is it more likely that advancements in AI and similar technology systems will erode human autonomy and agency to the point where the majority of people will be worse off than they are now?”
People’s opinion towards AI
Overall, 63 percent of respondents to this poll expressed optimism that the majority of people will be mostly better off in 2030. While 37% predicted that people will be worse off.
Numerous thought leaders who participated in this canvassing stated that humanity’ growing reliance on technology systems will only succeed if careful attention is pay to the engineering, distribution, and updating of these tools, platforms, and networks. Several of the most powerful, all-encompassing responses came from:
Sonia Katyal, a member of the inaugural US Commerce Department Digital Economy Board of Advisors, predicted, “By 2030, the most pressing questions will concern how public perceptions of AI. Its application will affect the future trajectory of civil rights.” Privacy, free expression, the freedom to assemble, and the technological creation of personhood will all resurface in this new AI setting. It is calling into question our most fundamental ideas about equality and opportunity for all. Who benefits and who suffers in this new society is contingent upon how thoroughly we assess these issues today, for the future.”
